The filing that blocks your prosecution path was submitted 18 months ago. You'll find out in due diligence.
Most of the frontier goes unseen.
Patents, papers, grants, clinical developments, regulatory activity, and competitor programs move before the market notices. Lapis watches the field continuously and isolates what can change your roadmap.
Select empty space to return
Controlled demonstration · records are synthetic · country geometry is real
Podcast guest
Cornerstone W26 cohortWhat are you not seeing that could change everything?
The danger is not one missed document. It is the movement that only becomes visible when fragmented evidence is connected.
A patent alone may look irrelevant. So may a grant, a rejected filing, a new clinical protocol, or a lab’s hiring pattern. Together, they can show an outside organization entering your claim space while you are still investing in the roadmap.
The organization behind the evidence matters more than the document.
What goes unseen is the strategic movement across records, institutions, companies, jurisdictions, and languages. That movement can block a program, weaken differentiation, or reveal an opportunity before the market notices.
The lab that's 14 months ahead of your program published in March. Nobody on your team saw it.
The NIH just funded your competitor's next two years of research. It's public record. You didn't know.
A rival's filing just narrowed the approval path your program depends on. It sat in a public docket for months.
The startup that just announced in your space wasn't stealth. They were just publishing in places you weren't watching.
The result that reshapes your roadmap won't be peer-reviewed for a year. It's already posted. The race started without you.
A protocol change or early endpoint can redirect a technical program before the market understands the implication.
A new company rarely appears from nowhere. Inventors, grants, hiring, and filings reveal the program while it is still forming.
Relevant activity is distributed across patent offices, registries, institutions, and languages your team does not monitor every day.
The evidence was public.
No single record looked decisive. Together, they revealed a competing program moving against your roadmap.
0.74Lead time
14 months
Tell the system what could change your future.
Your technology, roadmap, priorities, and scientific moat become the research perimeter. That context is what turns a global record stream into intelligence specific to your decisions.
Pick the field you work in.
Lapis prefills your scouts with sources, ontologies, and the right watchlist for your industry.
From global noise to one defensible signal.
The scout does not search for keywords. It reconstructs technical movement, resolves who is behind it, tests the evidence against your program, and escalates only what can change a decision.







By morning, the movement is visible.
Four ordinary records become one consequential finding: who is moving, where they overlap, how confident the evidence is, and what your team should do next.
Three weak records resolve into one competitor movement.
Evidence reconstructed. Strategic relevance scored against the private roadmap.
Review the claim family with counsel and test the overlap against the next prosecution milestone.
See earlier. Defend the moat. Move with proof.
Lapis gives an early-stage leadership team the situational awareness of a dedicated intelligence function without adding another database, inbox, or analyst workflow.
See the incoming block
Identify the organization, technical direction, and overlap while there is still time to respond.
Defend the scientific moat
Know where claims are crowding, assumptions are shifting, and your position remains differentiated.
Act with evidence
Bring impact, urgency, confidence, original sources, and a practical response into one decision surface.
Intelligence that keeps working when your team cannot.
Each scout owns a source domain. Together they learn your perimeter, read the primary evidence end to end, rank materiality, and deliver a cited brief on your schedule.

Scouts learn what you're working on, in private.
Share your roadmap, IP portfolio, and watchlist. Scouts privately index it and learn what counts as real news for your team, and what doesn't.
Book a call ↗The result is continuity. Your external intelligence function does not pause for travel, board meetings, diligence, or the limits of human attention.
YOUR WORLD, CHANGING
Distance is relevance to your program. Brightness is intensity. Dashed rings are uncertainty. Watch the quiet. Then watch it break.
Hover a point to learn why it matters to you · click to open · the field replays on demand
The whole landscape, on one canvas.
Pan across the terrain, zoom into an active field, and open any summit or white-space basin. Elevation reflects live research and filing density.
Global science, watched continuously.
Patent offices, regulators, institutions, filings, and collaborations connect across the jurisdictions and organizations moving your field. Grab the globe and spin it.
A finding your team can act on and defend.
Original records, reasoning, uncertainty, impact, and the next response sit in one brief. Every conclusion remains traceable to primary evidence.
Helix Therapeutics is 14 months ahead on hepatic-tropic LNP delivery.
From Atlas IP / Patents · Mira Literature · Felix Grants
A continuation filed last Thursday (USPTO 18/421,887) overlaps claims 3–7 of your LNP-7 prosecution path. Cross-referenced against a March bioRxiv preprint and a $1.8M NIH R01 from the same lab. This isn’t a one-off filing, it’s a coordinated program.
“Branched ionizable lipids enable selective hepatocyte delivery of large mRNA payloads”
Schaefer Lab, TU Munich · 4 authors · 87 citations
GM-148312 · $1.8M over 4 years · same lead investigator
Mechanism: hepatic LNP delivery for mRNA therapeutics
Application 18/421,887, claims 3–7 overlap LNP-7 chemistry
Two prior-art references appear missing from prosecution
If granted as filed, claims 3–7 would constrain your hepatic delivery program in US and EU markets, directly affecting your Q3 prosecution plan.
Review claims 3–7 against your prosecution strategy. We’ve flagged two prior-art references they may have missed, both linked in the full brief.
Patent offices. Research databases. Industry signals.
Patents, papers, and industry signals, ingested the moment they publish. The set below is a live sample; we bring new feeds and jurisdictions online every week.















ChatGPT is great if you know what to ask. The hard part is knowing what you don’t know.
Once you know about a specific patent, anyone can summarize it. Finding it in the first place, across millions of documents, in 18-month-old data, before it shows up anywhere obvious, is the job Lapis does.
See the movement before it changes the business.
Bring one active program. Lapis will map the organizations and external activity around it, show what changed, explain why it matters to your moat, and preserve the evidence behind the next decision.